How is voter privacy and ballot secrecy protected on JANMAT Digital?

JANMAT Digital utilizes salted HMAC-SHA256 privacy tokens. IP addresses and connection identifiers are hashed with a cryptographic salt; raw IPs and personal identifiers are never stored alongside ballot choices.

Can one person vote multiple times using incognito mode, multiple tabs, or bots?

No. The system enforces multi-signal validation combining browser tokens with server-side salted IP hashing, atomic mutex locking, and passive challenge heuristics to prevent duplicate voting.

Is JANMAT Digital affiliated with the Election Commission of India (ECI)?

No. JANMAT Digital is an independent civic-tech platform providing public opinion surveys and institutional election services for RWAs, cooperative societies, trade chambers, and universities. It is not affiliated with the statutory Election Commission of India.

How can an RWA, cooperative society, or university organize a digital election?

Organizations can request a proposal or consultation through our 'Get Proposal' page. JANMAT Digital provides digital election administration, voter roster verification, secret ballot design, and verifiable tally logs.

Madras HC: CCB Files Affidavit Against Anbil Mahesh Poyyamozhi

Madras High Court Receives CCB Affidavit Alleging Fund Collection by Minister Anbil Mahesh Poyyamozhi

The Central Crime Branch has submitted a counter-affidavit to the Madras High Court regarding allegations of party fund collection during Anbil Mahesh Poyyamozhi's ministerial tenure.

By JANMAT News Desk • Published: 13 Oct 2026, 01:30 am IST •Updated: 13 Oct 2026, 01:30 am IST • Source: The Hindu - National & Indian Elections

The Central Crime Branch (CCB) has formally submitted a counter-affidavit to the Madras High Court, detailing allegations regarding the collection of party funds during the tenure of Tamil Nadu School Education Minister Anbil Mahesh Poyyamozhi. This legal filing comes as part of ongoing judicial proceedings initiated by the Minister, who has sought to quash an existing First Information Report (FIR) registered against him. The matter is currently being heard by Justice V. Lakshminarayanan, who is overseeing the petition to dismiss the criminal charges.

Judicial Context and Legal Proceedings

The submission of the counter-affidavit marks a significant step in the legal challenge brought forward by the Minister. By filing this document, the CCB has placed its investigative findings before the court to justify the necessity of the FIR. The court is now tasked with evaluating the evidence presented by the state agency against the arguments provided by the petitioner. As the case remains sub-judice, the judiciary will determine whether the allegations warrant a continued investigation or if the grounds for the FIR are insufficient for further legal action.

Allegations of Financial Impropriety

According to the CCB’s submission, the investigation into the Minister's activities uncovered evidence suggesting that party funds were collected while he held the portfolio of School Education. The affidavit serves as the state’s official stance on the nature of the financial activities under scrutiny. While the specific details of the FIR remain limited to the mention of these fund collections, the filing establishes the state's intent to pursue the matter through the judicial system. This development highlights the ongoing scrutiny of political conduct and the intersection of ministerial duties with party-related financial activities.

Next Steps in the Madras High Court

Following the submission of the counter-affidavit, the Madras High Court will continue to hear arguments from both the petitioner and the CCB. Justice V. Lakshminarayanan will review the contents of the affidavit to decide on the validity of the plea to quash the FIR. The outcome of these proceedings will be critical in determining the future trajectory of the investigation. For further updates on judicial developments in Tamil Nadu, readers can follow our Legal Newsroom or review Election Commission guidelines regarding political accountability.